| Message |
their addition to the topic. Again, I wrote a very long article on the topic, and much of the material I presented is taken out of context from myself; which may lead you to believe that I am purposefully being leading. I assure you I am not. I'm sorry you find some of my sources questionable, but I am a reasonable person, so please inform me more specifically of what you are speaking of so that I may do the research myself. I appreciate you looking into the subject, and I hope you find that this is not some "conspiracy theory", but a clear representation of the fraud committed against the world's population. If you find otherwise, please share. "Are we supposed to think that all the scientists and governments who are concerned enough about global warming to have world-side summits don't have access to this information, but we do?" The entire leaked files are now assumed to have been gathered at the request of an audit done through England's Freedom of Information Act; this is only what I have learned through my reading. Audits such as this are usually only initiated once questionable circumstances arise. Some of the emails contain commentary from various heads of the CRU, which suggests they attempted to destroy some the possibly incriminating evidence before the FOIA could investigate; a serious crime in and of itself I might add. The Data contained in the leak contains over 100 megabytes of files (once uncompressed), containing a large number of emails between various individuals, including an alarming number of these "scientists" who are sent to represent us at these various world-summits. So my answer to your question: Yes, many of them had access to this fraudulent data because they created it. I should have included and interesting and fairly recent study done by professors Richard S. Lindzen and Yong-Sang Choi of MIT; a source I believe you'll find credible. I did not include it because I wanted to make sure I fully understood it, but never the less here is some more reading. Enjoy... 1.[ http://www.leif.org/EOS/2009GL039628-pip.pdf ]
2.[ www.larc.nasa.gov/erbe/ASDerbe.html ]">http://asd-[ www.larc.nasa.gov/erbe/ASDerbe.html ] ]
3.[ http://www.drroyspencer.com/ ]
|
 |
